Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. S. (2009). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.003.
Read the original source →Givers expected recipients to appreciate more expensive gifts more strongly, apparently treating higher price as a signal of thoughtfulness. Recipients, however, did not report the same relationship between gift price and appreciation. The study therefore challenges the intuitive assumption that spending more reliably produces a better-received gift.
Price should be treated as a constraint and suitability variable, not a quality score. More expensive should not automatically rank higher.
Last reviewed September 14, 2026.